I dealt with Heron myself to get the votes, knowing he wanted to be Chief Justice in return. Thus I assumed I needed Edmonds and the other 2 votes she brings. Originally posted by Patient Cras or any one else reading, is it possible to get 6 votes for a really progressive constitution without Heron or Edmonds help? I pretty much despised Heron because he was corrupt and so I wasn't willing to give him Chief Justice position. It's telling her you think Supreme Court should be limited to pure advisory body etc that triggers her, because she interprets it as the president trying to remove potential checks on his own actions. Edmonds is actually a conservative according to her codex entry she just really really dislikes Sollists and their particular take on what being conservative means, because she's also a democrat, and Soll together with his cronies made a mockery out of Sordish democracy.Īs such, if i remember right if you give her the options which amount to stating that you'd have given Supreme Court similar powers to what it has now, or at least *some* power, that aligns with her beliefs and pleases her enough to work with you. She's a moderate, so would prefer a comment on either 1 or 2 (haven't tested 1), but Judicial review is not something that should be removed if you are battling for separation of powers. Not much change to how Soll would have done things. If you want to remove soll's immunity, said he need to be properly investigated.įinally, I recommend making backup save when making draft, budget allocation, and finally before speaking with Edmonds.Originally posted by RobOda:That's the worst option to pick I believe ģ. If you are socialist, tell that Malenyevist isn't the only socialist. Just said the stuff about reform will be executed transparently and limit of branchs etc. She also has soft spot for Alphonso, so mentions him when she asked about Arcasian influence (capitalist) or when she asked about no impeachment. Assure her the centrist is safe if you want to remove judges. Now for Edmonds, I recommend picking Law as background and eat salad. You want President that has absolute power and don't care about Soll? Or like me, you want to hang Soll instead? Your pick. So my suggestion, pick either 1 or 2 reform to save headache. All Out Dictator the combination of 1 and 2.For this one, you might need to give up on absolute veto and impeachment. The Old Guard will hesitate to vote, so aside from Edmonds, you will need to promise Heron on replacing Hawker AND form ACP to pressure them further. Focused on removing Soll by removing Justices and Soll's immunity.ACP is still a safety net if you are uncertain, and I heard it will make centrist happy. This one, Old guard isn't that scared, you just need to convince Edmonds and bribe Heron with 1 wealth. Focused on increasing presidential power without touching Justices or Soll.I think there are 3 kind of dictator reforms I obviously have the Constitutional article that allows a President to remove justices, but that never stopped her from going with me on reformist runs.Īny tips on getting this thing through the Supreme court? Now, I can't get her to agree at all, following the usual dialogues (get the salad, talk shit on Old guard, say how important courts role is). Before the most recent patch, I could convince her to vote with me every time. Promising Heron the new job is usually good for 2-3 votes.īut the real issue is Justice Edmonds. Went with the ACP and went after the judges for pressure. Had 2 votes for one run and 3 votes for the other. I've had two runs now and I got it past the assembly both times (167 yays both times).īut I can't even get close to passing the Supreme court. Have a lot of hours, feel pretty comfortable with the game, but for the life of me I cannot get this achievement for passing 15% election threshold and sign the Campaign Finance bill in the same game.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |